Lest we think that what some currently perceive as anger in America over political divides is something new, Doris Kearns Goodwin reminds us of past congressional misconduct in her Pulitzer Prize winning biography NO ORDINARY TIME about Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt: "On a number of occasions, particularly in the nineteenth century, the debates had descended into physical violence as members brandished pistols, smashed one another's heads with tongs, canes, and brass spittoons, and pummeled each other with fists". At least we have not devolved to that level of behavior which was confined to the House of Representatives at the time. But what has happened during the last century-plus is the rise in technology (e.g. television, computers, internet, smart phones, text messaging, e-mail, Twitter and, yes, blogs like this one) that permit everyone with access to this technology to exercise his/her rights under the first amendment, and instantaneously spread his/her thoughts and opinions world-wide in a nanosecond, sometimes with little or no thought as to whether or not they are true, or the condition of the people who hear or read them, or what ramifications they might generate. That is why the tone in which they are expressed is extremely important. Former President Bill Clinton said it best this past week in remarks before the Center for American Progress Action Fund: "....the words we use really do matter". The intent is not to stifle debate on profound public issues, but rather just make everyone engaged in such dialog, including radio and television personalities, aware that inflamed and extreme rhetoric has very serious consequences, in my view.
Continuing, as well as building on last week's recognition of local artists, I would like to begin adding local galleries to my list of links for readers to access and enjoy just for the pure pleasure of what they offer. So, please advise of any that you feel should be added, but prior permission of any such recommended artist or gallery will be obtained before posting on this blog.
ARTISTS:
Laura Raborn at http://www.paintingsofhome and http://www.claygifts.com
Jim Johnson at http://www.yessy.com/jimjohnson/gallery.html
Russ Powell at http://www.powellphotos.com
GALLERIES:
Local Colour Gallery at http://www.localcolourgallery.com
Chroma Gallery at http://www.chromagallery.com
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Sunday, April 11, 2010
Unintended Consequences
Recent publicity about the Arkansas Scholarship Lottery and a personal experience with another college scholarship program which I feared might be affected by our lottery has caused me to once again evaluate the full impact of these Lottery Scholarships on our state. First, let me disclose that I was never a fan of the lottery for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is that there seems to be something basically out of whack to me when an endeavor takes 75% of the proceeds of its operation for administrative, staff, marketing and payout expenses, and then sells the true value of the program on the remaining 25% of the proceeds, even though that minority portion may go for the worthy cause of funding college scholarships. Then there are the social, economic and moral issues widely publicized that always seem to go with this type of gaming.
Those questions aside, I was always curious as to what effect this new pool of scholarships, which are based strictly on grade point or ACT scores ( go to http://ltgovernor.arkansas.gov/scholarship_lottery_faqs.html for a complete Q and A on these criteria), would have on other existing college scholarships which require an application process that examines a variety of factors including need, superior academic achievement, participation in extracurricular activities, community service, work history, teacher and counselor evaluation, etc., all of which form the basis for judging the whole person before awarding financial assistance to students pursuing a college degree. Well, I found out. In the case with which I am familiar, the Lottery Scholarships may well have been a contributing factor in a drastic reduction in the number of applicants this year compared to previous years. While by no means conclusive, there seemed to have been a prevailing attitude among graduating seniors of one known high school of why bother when I can get more financial assistance by just passing the two thresholds mentioned above. Is this possible unintended consequence a good thing? Frankly, I don't know, but a couple of people with whom I have visited who do know about these things think not. However, I would be interested in knowing what you think, so please offer your comments.
On another note, beginning today I would like to start recognizing some of our great local artists in Little Rock by featuring their websites for you to access and enjoy the fruits of their talent. As time goes on I would like to add others, so please advise of any known such websites.
First is Laura Raborn's at http://www.paintingsofhome and http://www.claygifts.com
Second is Jim Johnson's at http://www.yessy.com/jimjohnson/gallery.html
Those questions aside, I was always curious as to what effect this new pool of scholarships, which are based strictly on grade point or ACT scores ( go to http://ltgovernor.arkansas.gov/scholarship_lottery_faqs.html for a complete Q and A on these criteria), would have on other existing college scholarships which require an application process that examines a variety of factors including need, superior academic achievement, participation in extracurricular activities, community service, work history, teacher and counselor evaluation, etc., all of which form the basis for judging the whole person before awarding financial assistance to students pursuing a college degree. Well, I found out. In the case with which I am familiar, the Lottery Scholarships may well have been a contributing factor in a drastic reduction in the number of applicants this year compared to previous years. While by no means conclusive, there seemed to have been a prevailing attitude among graduating seniors of one known high school of why bother when I can get more financial assistance by just passing the two thresholds mentioned above. Is this possible unintended consequence a good thing? Frankly, I don't know, but a couple of people with whom I have visited who do know about these things think not. However, I would be interested in knowing what you think, so please offer your comments.
On another note, beginning today I would like to start recognizing some of our great local artists in Little Rock by featuring their websites for you to access and enjoy the fruits of their talent. As time goes on I would like to add others, so please advise of any known such websites.
First is Laura Raborn's at http://www.paintingsofhome and http://www.claygifts.com
Second is Jim Johnson's at http://www.yessy.com/jimjohnson/gallery.html
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Abundant Life
As we celebrate one of Christendom's most sacred holidays today, it only seems fitting to depart from my secular commentary to wish everyone of all religions, faiths and persuasions a most joyous Easter Sunday regardless of whether or not you share the popular Christian belief in the actual events of that day some 2,000 years ago. To me it is all about love, forgiveness, renewal, hope, grace and salvation as ordained by God or other higher being, which seems to be a central tenant of all religions, to bring about a more abundant life for us all. In the early 1950's Bishop Fulton J. Sheen began his famous "Life is Worth Living" television series in which I can still remember him quoting the famous John 10:10 passage - "I have come that you might have life, and that you might have it more abundantly".
But in our contemporary world, perhaps the best expression of the true meaning of Easter was made by President Obama in his brief weekly address yesterday which I invite you to both read and watch at wcbstv.com/national/Obama.easter.message.2.1609494.html . Surely, we can all agree with the essence of his message relating to the common purpose of the "family of man" to aspire for a more meaningful life. In addition we here in Little Rock can carry that Easter spirit of renewal a step further by enjoying and sharing with our family and friends the rebirth of nature blooming all around us during one of the most beautiful times of the year, as seen in the budding azaleas, redbuds, dogwoods, forsythias, jonquils and tulips. In short, simply pause and take stock of our many blessings and what is truly important in our lives, in my view.
But in our contemporary world, perhaps the best expression of the true meaning of Easter was made by President Obama in his brief weekly address yesterday which I invite you to both read and watch at wcbstv.com/national/Obama.easter.message.2.1609494.html . Surely, we can all agree with the essence of his message relating to the common purpose of the "family of man" to aspire for a more meaningful life. In addition we here in Little Rock can carry that Easter spirit of renewal a step further by enjoying and sharing with our family and friends the rebirth of nature blooming all around us during one of the most beautiful times of the year, as seen in the budding azaleas, redbuds, dogwoods, forsythias, jonquils and tulips. In short, simply pause and take stock of our many blessings and what is truly important in our lives, in my view.
Sunday, March 28, 2010
On the Horns of a Dilemma
Last month, on February 25th, I had the pleasure of listening to an extraordinary presentation by Mr. Claiborne Deming, former president and CEO of Murphy Oil Company in El Dorado, on the subject of climate change. While there are those who think climate change, also known as global warming, is fiction, Mr. Deming made a powerful and persuasive argument that we are experiencing that phenomenon by our increased use of fossil fuels due to a variety of factors, not the least of which are population growth and increased wealth. While he presented a vast amount of research data to back up his thesis, I came away with the following basic understanding of his message, but please go to http://clintonschool.uasys.edu and click on Distinguished Speakers to watch a video of his full presentation and judge for yourself.
1. There is a relatively finite amount of total energy output world-wide of 400 quadrillion BTUs that will remain relatively constant for the next twenty years.
2. Wealthier people consume more energy per capita than less wealthy people.
3. As a result of #2 above, we in the United States consume 25% of that total output, even though we only have 5% of the world population.
4. The world temperature is on an upward trend thought to be caused by the increased use of fossil fuels.
5. The emerging nations of China, India, Indonesia and Brazil are increasing in both population and wealth much faster than we are and, therefore, will be consuming not only more energy per capita but a greater share of that total energy output in the future.
6. Because of their relatively low cost and abundant supply, fossil fuels, principally coal which emits some of the highest levels of carbon dioxide, will remain the primary source of energy for these nations in the foreseeable future which will only exacerbate the climate change problem.
7. We must find affordable alternatives to fill that gap between that total available energy and the ever increasing demand that is rapidly shifting that finite supply to other nations.
In regard to Mr. Deming's conclusions as to how we as individuals and collectively as a nation address what he terms as a huge "dilemma", I understood them to be:
1. Practice conservation.
2. Increase efficiency.
3. Pursue renewable resources like wind and solar.
4. Make more use of our immense natural gas supplies.
5. Build more nuclear power plants.
The fact that of the 53 nuclear power plants currently under construction in the world today none are being built in the United States is astounding but not surprising to me. No doubt that extended hiatus is related to the regulatory obstacles and fear that have stifled such development since the Three Mile Island incident thirty-one years ago yesterday on March 28, 1979, the history of which you can read in great detail at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/3mile-isle.html. France, where 85% of its power generation is nuclear, figured this out decades ago. Additionally, I feel we must also rely on brand new technologies like the Bloom Box which was profiled in a "60 Minutes" story on February 21st, and has been written up in the New York Times, the Los Angeles and many other publications including our own Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, to help solve this problem. Wal-Mart, Bank of America, Federal Express and Google all now use it as a power source, so it is obviously a creditable technology that is fascinating to read about at http://bloomenergy.com. And, finally, we must definitely examine the total disconnect in public policy that apparently allows new coal-fired power plants to be built when those being fueled by natural gas, a cleaner energy source also found in abundant supply in this country, are currently operating at 50% capacity nation-wide and one in southern Arkansas at only 24% (Mr. Deming's statistics), in my view.
NOTE: "Down to the Wire: Climate Policy Alternatives" will be the subject of another timely presentation on climate change at the Clinton School of Public Policy at 6:00 pm Wednesday evening, March 31st.
1. There is a relatively finite amount of total energy output world-wide of 400 quadrillion BTUs that will remain relatively constant for the next twenty years.
2. Wealthier people consume more energy per capita than less wealthy people.
3. As a result of #2 above, we in the United States consume 25% of that total output, even though we only have 5% of the world population.
4. The world temperature is on an upward trend thought to be caused by the increased use of fossil fuels.
5. The emerging nations of China, India, Indonesia and Brazil are increasing in both population and wealth much faster than we are and, therefore, will be consuming not only more energy per capita but a greater share of that total energy output in the future.
6. Because of their relatively low cost and abundant supply, fossil fuels, principally coal which emits some of the highest levels of carbon dioxide, will remain the primary source of energy for these nations in the foreseeable future which will only exacerbate the climate change problem.
7. We must find affordable alternatives to fill that gap between that total available energy and the ever increasing demand that is rapidly shifting that finite supply to other nations.
In regard to Mr. Deming's conclusions as to how we as individuals and collectively as a nation address what he terms as a huge "dilemma", I understood them to be:
1. Practice conservation.
2. Increase efficiency.
3. Pursue renewable resources like wind and solar.
4. Make more use of our immense natural gas supplies.
5. Build more nuclear power plants.
The fact that of the 53 nuclear power plants currently under construction in the world today none are being built in the United States is astounding but not surprising to me. No doubt that extended hiatus is related to the regulatory obstacles and fear that have stifled such development since the Three Mile Island incident thirty-one years ago yesterday on March 28, 1979, the history of which you can read in great detail at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/3mile-isle.html. France, where 85% of its power generation is nuclear, figured this out decades ago. Additionally, I feel we must also rely on brand new technologies like the Bloom Box which was profiled in a "60 Minutes" story on February 21st, and has been written up in the New York Times, the Los Angeles and many other publications including our own Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, to help solve this problem. Wal-Mart, Bank of America, Federal Express and Google all now use it as a power source, so it is obviously a creditable technology that is fascinating to read about at http://bloomenergy.com. And, finally, we must definitely examine the total disconnect in public policy that apparently allows new coal-fired power plants to be built when those being fueled by natural gas, a cleaner energy source also found in abundant supply in this country, are currently operating at 50% capacity nation-wide and one in southern Arkansas at only 24% (Mr. Deming's statistics), in my view.
NOTE: "Down to the Wire: Climate Policy Alternatives" will be the subject of another timely presentation on climate change at the Clinton School of Public Policy at 6:00 pm Wednesday evening, March 31st.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
